Uncorrected Refractive Error in the African American Eye Disease Study.

Importance: Refractive error remains the largest cause of correctable visual impairment in the US. Correction of refractive error will reduce visual impairment and its associated morbidity but also improve quality of life and productivity. Objective: To determine the burden of and risk factors (RFs) associated with any uncorrected refractive error (UCRE) and unmet refractive need (URN) in a population-based sample of African American adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study, conducted from April 2014 to April 2018, included a population-based sample of self-identified African American participants 40 years and older from 30 contiguous census tracts in Inglewood, California. Participants underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and an in-home-administered questionnaire to assess sociodemographic, lifestyle, biological, medical, and health care and eye care usage RFs associated with UCRE and URN. Measurements of visual acuity (VA) were performed using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Noncycloplegic automated refraction with supplemental subjective refraction was performed. UCRE was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye. URN was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye in those persons who were visually impaired. Sex- and age-specific burden of UCRE and URN were calculated, and multiple regression analyses were used to identify independent RFs. Study data were analyzed from May 2018 to December 2023. Exposures: Presence or absence of correctable refractive error. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported sex- and age-specific prevalence of and risk indicators of UCRE and URN. Results: Of the 7957 eligible participants in the African American Eye Disease Study (AFEDS), 6347 (80%) completed both the in-home interview and the clinical examination. Of these, 6337 participants (mean [SD] age, 61 [11] years; 3997 female [63%]) with complete refractive error data were included in the analysis. Refractive error-related correctable visual impairment was present in over two-thirds of participants with visual impairment (68.7%). The overall prevalence of any UCRE was 14.6% (925 of 6337), and the overall prevalence of any URN was 5.4% (URN1 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve 20/40 or better with correction], 157 of 2893; URN2 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve an improvement of 2 or more lines with refractive correction], 155 of 2891). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study suggest a high burden of refractive error-associated correctable refractive error in African American adults, making it the leading cause of visual impairment in this population. Providing universal coverage for vision care and prescription glasses is an affordable and achievable health care intervention that could reduce the burden of visual impairment in African American adults by over two-thirds and likely raise the quality of life and work productivity, especially in this vulnerable minority population.

Prevalence of Comprehensive Eye Examination in Preschool Children With Eye Conditions.

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence of comprehensive eye examinations in multiethnic preschool children, including children with visually significant eye conditions, and identify factors associated with comprehensive eye examinations. Methods: A sample of 9,197 African American, Hispanic, Asian American, and non-Hispanic White children aged 6-72 months was recruited for the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study from 2003 to 2011. Logistic regression performed in 2022 identified independent factors associated with parent-reported history of comprehensive eye examinations. The proportion of children with previous comprehensive eye examinations and the proportion with undetected amblyopia or strabismus were measured. Results: The prevalence of comprehensive eye examinations was 6.3% overall and 38.3%, 24.8%, 19.1%, 15.1%, and 9.8% among children with strabismus, amblyopia, significant anisometropia, hyperopia, and astigmatism, respectively. Children without prior comprehensive eye examinations were more likely to have undetected amblyopia or strabismus than those with comprehensive eye examination history (ps<0.001). The prevalence of comprehensive eye examinations was higher among older children. Prevalence varied by race/ethnicity, with 8.1%, 7.9%, 6.3%, and 4.9% of non-Hispanic White, Asian American, African American, and Hispanic children having had prior comprehensive eye examinations, respectively; however, the differences did not remain after adjusting for other associated factors. Older age, a primary caregiver with a college/university degree or higher, having vision insurance, gestational age <33 weeks, neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosis, strabismus, and ocular disease history were all statistically significantly associated with a relatively higher prevalence of comprehensive eye examinations in multivariable analyses. Conclusions: Comprehensive eye examinations were uncommon among preschool children, including those with treatable vision disorders. Interventions, such as parent education and vision insurance, are needed to imaprove comprehensive eye examination access and utilization for at-risk preschool children.

Use of the Spanish English Neuropsychological Assessment Scale in older adult Latines and those at risk for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish English Neuropsychological Assessment Scale (SENAS) is a cognitive battery with English and Spanish versions for use with persons for whom either language is predominant. Few studies have examined its utility outside the normative sample. The current study examined SENAS performance in samples of older adult Latines and Latines with or at risk for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) mutations. METHOD: The SENAS was administered to 202 older adults from the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES) and 29 adults with (carriers) or without (non-carriers) mutations causing ADAD. We examined associations between SENAS, age, education, and language (LALES) and between SENAS, estimated years from familial age of dementia diagnosis, education, language, and acculturation (ADAD). Partial correlations were used to examine differences in correlational strength between estimated years from familial age of dementia diagnosis and SENAS scores among ADAD carriers compared to chronological age and SENAS in the LALES sample. Exploratory t-tests were performed to examine SENAS performance differences between ADAD carriers and non-carriers. RESULTS: In an older adult sample (LALES), increased age correlated with worse verbal delayed recall; English fluency and higher education correlated with better naming and visuospatial subtest performance. Among ADAD carriers, verbal and nonverbal delayed recall and object naming subtest performance worsened as they approached their familial age of dementia diagnosis. English fluency and higher U.S.-acculturation were related to better SENAS performance among carriers and non-carriers. Tests of verbal delayed recall and object naming best distinguished ADAD carriers from their familial non-carrier counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Verbal delayed recall and object naming measures appear to be most sensitive to age-related changes in older adult samples and mutation-related changes in distinguishing ADAD carriers from non-carriers. Future research should examine the sensitivity of SENAS in other samples, such as larger samples of symptomatic ADAD carriers and other AD subtypes.

Classification of Angle Closure Severity by Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of Ocular Biometrics in the Dark and Light.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the classification of angle closure eyes based on hierarchical cluster analysis of ocular biometrics measured in the dark and light using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Methods: Participants of the Chinese American Eye Study received complete eye examinations to identify primary angle closure suspects (PACS) and primary angle closure without/with glaucoma (PAC/G). AS-OCT was performed in the dark and light. Biometric parameters describing the angle, iris, lens, and anterior chamber were analyzed. Hierarchical clustering was performed using Ward's method. Post hoc logistic regression models were developed to identify biometric predictors of angle closure staging. Results: Analysis of 159 eyes with PACS (N = 120) or PAC/G (N = 39) produced 2 clusters in the dark and light. In both analyses, cluster 1 (N = 132 in the dark and N = 126 in the light) was characterized by smaller angle opening distance (AOD)750 and trabecular iris space area (TISA)750, greater iris curvature (IC), and greater lens vault (LV; P < 0.001) than cluster 2. The proportion of PAC/PACG to PACS eyes was significantly higher in cluster 1 than 2 in the light (36:90 and 3:30, respectively; P = 0.02), but not the dark (36:96 and 3:24, respectively; P = 0.08). On multivariable regression analyses, smaller TISA750 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84 per 0.01 mm2) and AOD750 (OR = 0.93 per 0.01 mm) in the light and smaller TISA750 (OR = 0.86 per 0.01 mm2) in the dark conferred higher risk of PAC/G (P ≤ 0.02). Conclusions: Unsupervised cluster analysis of ocular biometrics can classify angle closure eyes by severity. Static biometrics measured in the light and dark are both predictive of PAC/G. Translational Relevance: Clustering of biometrics measured in the light could provide an alternative source of information to risk-stratify angle closure eyes for more severe disease.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Roles of Myopia and Ocular Biometrics as Risk Factors for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Purpose: Assess how the roles of refractive error (RE) and ocular biometrics as risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) differ by race and ethnicity. Methods: Data from the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES) and the Chinese American Eye Study (CHES), two population-based epidemiological studies, were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression and interaction term analyses were performed to assess relationships between POAG and its risk factors, including RE and axial length (AL), and to assess effect modification by race/ethnicity. Results: Analysis included 7601 phakic participants of LALES (47.3%) and CHES (52.7%) with age ≥ 50 years. Mean age was 60.6 ± 8.3 years; 60.9% were female. The prevalence and unadjusted risk of POAG were higher in LALES than CHES (6.0% and 4.0%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 1.55; P < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, significant risk factors for POAG included Latino ethnicity (OR = 2.25; P < 0.001), refractive myopia (OR = 1.54 for mild, OR = 2.47 for moderate, OR = 3.94 for high compared to non-myopes; P ≤ 0.003), and longer AL (OR = 1.37 per mm; P < 0.001). AL (standardized regression coefficient [SRC] = 0.3) was 2.7-fold more strongly associated with POAG than high myopia status (SRC = 0.11). There was no modifying effect by race/ethnicity on the association between RE (per diopter) or AL (per millimeter) and POAG (P = 0.49). Conclusions: Although the POAG risk conferred by myopic RE and longer AL is similar between Latino and Chinese Americans, the difference in POAG prevalence between the two groups is narrowed by higher myopia prevalence among Chinese Americans. Racial/ethnic populations with higher myopia incidence may become disproportionately affected by POAG in the context of the global myopia epidemic.

Refractive Error and Anterior Chamber Depth as Risk Factors in Primary Angle Closure Disease: The Chinese American Eye Study.

PRCIS: The risk of primary angle closure disease (PACD) rises rapidly with greater hyperopia while remaining relatively low for all degrees of myopia. Refractive error (RE) is useful for angle closure risk stratification in the absence of biometric data. PURPOSE: To assess the role of RE and anterior chamber depth (ACD) as risk factors in PACD. METHODS: Chinese American Eye Study participants received complete eye examinations including refraction, gonioscopy, amplitude-scan biometry, and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography imaging. PACD included primary angle closure suspect (≥3 quadrants of angle closure on gonioscopy) and primary angle closure/primary angle closure glaucoma (peripheral anterior synechiae or intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg). Logistic regression models were developed to assess associations between PACD and RE and/or ACD adjusted for sex and age. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curves were plotted to assess continuous relationships between variables. RESULTS: Three thousand nine hundred seventy eyes (3403 open angle and 567 PACD) were included. The risk of PACD increased with greater hyperopia [odds ratio (OR) = 1.41 per diopter (D); P < 0.001] and shallower ACD (OR = 1.75 per 0.1 mm; P < 0.001). Hyperopia (≥ + 0.5 D; OR = 5.03) and emmetropia (-0.5 D to +0.5 D; OR = 2.78) conferred a significantly higher risk of PACD compared with myopia (≤0.5 D). ACD (standardized regression coefficient = -0.54) was a 2.5-fold stronger predictor of PACD risk compared with RE (standardized regression coefficient = 0.22) when both variables were included in one multivariable model. The sensitivity and specificity of a 2.6 mm ACD cutoff for PACD were 77.5% and 83.2% and of a +2.0 D RE cutoff were 22.3% and 89.1%. CONCLUSION: The risk of PACD rises rapidly with greater hyperopia while remaining relatively low for all degrees of myopia. Although RE is a weaker predictor of PACD than ACD, it remains a useful metric to identify patients who would benefit from gonioscopy in the absence of biometric data.

Visual Field Loss Impacts Vision-Specific Quality of Life by Race and Ethnicity: The Multiethnic Ophthalmology Cohorts of California Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of visual field loss (VFL) on vision-specific quality of life (VSQOL) by race, ethnicity, and age. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 3 population-based, prospective cohort studies. PARTICIPANTS: The Multiethnic Ophthalmology Cohorts of California Study (MOCCaS) participants included 6142 Latinos, 4582 Chinese Americans, and 6347 Black Americans from Los Angeles County. METHODS: A total of 17 071 adults aged 40 years and older completed comprehensive interviews and ophthalmic examinations from 2000 to 2018. VFL was measured using the Humphrey Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard 24-2 test as decibels (dB) of mean deviation (MD). Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the impact of VFL in the better-seeing eye on self-reported VSQOL scores, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariables. Hierarchical modeling was performed to determine the best-fit model after considering main effects and interactions by race, ethnicity, and age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The VSQOL scores were measured using the 25 Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25). Item response theory was used to model vision-related task and well-being composite scores, and classical test theory was used to calculate 11 vision subscales. RESULTS: The impact of VFL on VSQOL varied by race and ethnicity. Five-point reductions in task and well-being scores were reached after mild-to-moderate VFL for Latinos (6.7 dB and 7.5 dB), mild-to-moderate VFL for Chinese Americans (7.0 dB and 8.7 dB), and moderate-to-severe VFL for Black Americans (10.1 dB and 12.9 dB), respectively. Differences met statistical significance when comparing Latinos and Black Americans (P < 0.001). Visual field loss had the largest effect on driving among all participants. Driving difficulties were the only VSQOL outcome modified by age; participants aged 65 years and older scored 0.487 lower points per MD of VFL (P < 0.001). Subscales most affected by VFL included role function, mental health, and dependency. CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity modified the impact of VFL on VSQOL, even after adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. In MOCCaS, Latinos and Chinese Americans reported a greater change in VSQOL than Black Americans for the same level of VFL. Future work should assess whether findings were due to socioeconomic or cultural differences in perception of visual function.

Impact of Visual Field Loss on Vision-Specific Quality of Life in African Americans: The African American Eye Disease Study.

PURPOSE: To elucidate how visual field loss (VFL) impacts self-reported vision-specific quality of life (VSQOL) in African Americans, who experience a disproportionate burden of visual impairment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based cohort. METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 7,957) were recruited who self-identified as African American, were aged 40 years or older, and resided in Inglewood, California, USA. A total of 6,347 participants (80.0%) completed clinical eye examinations. Total mean deviation (MD) of VFL was measured bilaterally as decibels (dB) using the Humphrey SITA Standard 24-2 test. VSQOL was measured using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) and scored using item response theory (IRT). RESULTS: Participants with reliable data (n = 5,121) had a mean age of 60.7 years (standard deviation 11.0); those with worse VFL were older; had more comorbidities, lower income, less education, and worse visual acuity; and were more likely to be unemployed and depressed. Using IRT analysis, a change in VF of 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3, 7.7) dB and 9.2 (95% CI: 7.5, 11.9) dB was necessary to observe a meaningful (5-point) difference in vision-related task and emotional well-being scores, respectively. VFL had the greatest impact on self-reported driving ability (6.0 dB [95% CI: 5.2, 7.1]), followed by satisfaction with general vision, near vision, vision-related mental health, and peripheral vision. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest impact of VFL reported by African Americans was on their ability to complete visual tasks, especially for driving. An effect of VFL on emotional well-being also was observed, but the magnitude of association was about 50% lower for well-being compared to that of task.

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PREVALENT LENS OPACITIES IN CHINESE AMERICAN ADULTS: THE CHINESE AMERICAN EYE STUDY.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors associated with lens opacities in Chinese Americans. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study of 4,582 Chinese Americans ≥50 years residing in Monterey Park, California. Participants completed a comprehensive clinical examination with lens assessment using the Lens Opacities Classification System II, with lens opacities defined by a grade ≥2 in either eye. Participants were considered to have nuclear-only, cortical-only, or posterior subcapsular (PSC)-only if that was the only type of opacity present in both eyes. RESULTS: Cortical-only opacity was associated with older age, diabetes mellitus (OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1-2.1), and family history of cataracts (OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.2-1.9). Nuclear-only opacity was associated with older age, diabetes mellitus (OR 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9), greater waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.4), and high-density lipoprotein (OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.02-1.2). Mixed-type opacities were associated with older age, greater waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.6), and higher HbA1 c (OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.4). Taller height (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.6-0.8), greater weight (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97-0.99), and higher diastolic pressure (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.96-0.99) were protective. CONCLUSION: CHES identified a strong, dose-response association between age and all types of prevalent lens opacities, which suggests an increasing cataract burden in Chinese Americans based on aging populations. CHES results demonstrate general consistency with previous population-based studies in regard to more sedentary lifestyle exposures (e.g., Westernized lifestyle) and prevalent cortical-only, nuclear-only, and mixed-type opacities, yet also identified further sedentary lifestyle exposures associated with prevalent lens opacities. Improved glycemic control and a more active lifestyle that minimizes factors contributing to metabolic syndrome may help reduce the burden of vision loss associated with lens opacities.

Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Healthy Eyes of Black, Chinese, and Latino Americans: A Population-Based Multiethnic Study.

PURPOSE: To compare peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness among healthy adults by race and ethnicity and to identify determinants of RNFL thickness. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 6133 individuals (11 585 eyes) from 3 population-based studies in Los Angeles County, California, 50 years of age or older and of self-described African, Chinese, or Latin American ancestry. METHODS: We measured RNFL thickness and optic nerve head parameters using the Cirrus HD-OCT 4000. Multivariate linear mixed regression was used to evaluate factors associated with RNFL thickness among participants without ocular diseases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinants and modifiers of RNFL thickness. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 60.1 years (standard deviation, 7.4 years). Black Americans showed the lowest RNFL thickness and smallest cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), and Chinese Americans showed the largest CDR and disc area after adjusting for age and gender (all P < 0.05). Per each 10-year older age group, the average RNFL thickness was 2.5 µm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3.1 µm), 2.8 µm (95% CI, 2.3-3.3 µm), and 3.5 µm (95% CI, 2.9-4.1 µm) thinner for Black, Chinese, and Latino Americans, respectively (age trend P < 0.05 and interaction P = 0.041). Black Americans compared with Chinese Americans, older age, male gender, hypertension, diabetes, greater axial length (AL), bigger disc area, and lower scan signal strength were associated with thinner average RNFL. Race, age, AL, disc area, and scan signal strength consistently were associated with RNFL thickness in all quadrants, whereas gender, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with RNFL thickness in select quadrants. Age and race explained the greatest proportion of variance of RNFL thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically important differences in RNFL thickness are present in healthy adults 50 years of age or older from different racial and ethnic groups of the same age, with the thinnest measures observed in Black Americans. This difference remains after accounting for disc size and AL. Furthermore, age-related RNFL thinning differs by race and ethnicity. Longitudinal studies are needed to verify our findings and to assess the influence of race and ethnicity in the clinical application of RNFL thickness.

A Mitochondrial Genome-Wide Association Study of Cataract in a Latino Population.

Purpose: Over 9.5 million Latinos could be affected by cataracts by 2050. However, no known cataract genetic risk alleles have been identified in Latinos. Moreover, no mitochondrial genome-wide association studies (MiWAS) have been conducted on cataracts in a Latino cohort despite the association between mitochondrial dysfunction and cataracts. Our purpose was to identify a mitochondrial DNA variant that associated with cataracts in a large-scale Latino population. Methods: We conducted an MiWAS to identify mitochondrial single-nucleotide polymorphisms that modify cataract risk in nearly 3500 individuals enrolled in the Los Angles Latino Eye Study cohort, the largest Latino-specific cohort with comprehensive cataract data. Our analytic strategy for MiWAS included logistic regression on cataract occurrence while controlling for mitochondrial genetic ancestry, age, and biological sex. Results: We found that MitoG228A (rs41323649) alternative allele carriers experienced a five times greater risk for cataracts compared with reference allele carriers. Alternative allele carriers also developed cataracts earlier in life compared with reference allele carriers. Intracohort cross-validation with 10-fold resampling and five repeats showed that the effect of MitoG228A remained significant. Conclusions: MitoG228A increased risk for cataracts five-fold in approximately 3500 Latinos. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first cataract MiWAS on a large-scale Latino population. This association needs to be validated in an independent cohort. Translational Relevance: Our discovery hypothesis-generating study suggest MitoG228A has potential to be used as a risk factor in the clinic and as a target for therapeutics. With validation via an independent cohort, MitoG228A could be used to estimate cataract risk for a Latino to reduce complications later in life.

Factors Associated with Visual Impairment in Chinese American Adults: The Chinese American Eye Study.

Purpose: To assess associations between multiple factors comprising a conceptual model of visual impairment (VI) in a population of Chinese Americans (CAs), and identify independent VI risk factors. Methods: A population-based study of 4582 CAs aged 50 years and older residing in Monterey Park, California. A comprehensive eye examination was performed. VI was defined as best-corrected visual acuity <20/40 (US definition) in the better-seeing eye. Results: Of five independent risk factors identified, age and self-reported history of ocular disease were most strongly associated with VI. Participants 70 years and older were 10.0 times as likely to have VI compared to those in their 50s (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0-25.0), while those with a history of ocular disease were 4.2 times as likely to have VI (95% CI 2.2-7.8). Additional risk factors included low education (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.8), low acculturation (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.0-17.3) and self-reported history of diabetes (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2). A comparison to data previously described from the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study indicated that four of the factors that predict VI risk in CAs also represent clinically relevant risk factors for VI in Latinos. Conclusions: Screening programs for individuals with advanced age and a history of ocular disease have the potential to reduce the burden of VI in CAs, as do educational programs for those with fewer years in school, a history of diabetes, and low acculturation.

Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of multiple machine learning models using full retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness maps in detecting glaucoma. DESIGN: Case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 93 eyes from 69 patients with glaucoma and 128 eyes from 128 age- and sex-matched healthy controls from the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES), a large population-based, longitudinal cohort study consisting of Latino participants aged ≥40 years residing in El Puente, California. METHODS: The 6×6-mm RNFL thickness maps centered on the optic nerve head (Cirrus 4000; Zeiss, Dublin, CA) were supplied to 4 different machine learning algorithms. These models included 2 conventional machine learning algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and 2 convolutional neural nets, ResNet-18 and GlaucomaNet, which was a custom-made deep learning network. All models were tested with 5-fold cross validation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the curve (AUC) statistics to assess diagnostic accuracy of each model compared with conventional average circumpapillary RNFL thickness. RESULTS: All 4 models achieved similarly high diagnostic accuracies, with AUC values ranging from 0.91 to 0.92. These values were significantly higher than those for average circumpapillary RNFL thickness, which had an AUC of 0.76 in the same patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Superior diagnostic performance was achieved with both conventional machine learning and convolutional neural net models compared with circumpapillary RNFL thickness. This supports the importance of the spatial structure of RNFL thickness map data in diagnosing glaucoma and further efforts to optimize our use of this data.

Factors Associated with Prevalent Diabetic Retinopathy in Chinese Americans: The Chinese American Eye Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with prevalent diabetic retinopathy (DR) among Chinese American adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to compare these factors to ones previously described for a population-based sample of Latinos with a higher DR prevalence. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 4582 Chinese Americans aged 50 or older residing in Monterey Park, California. METHODS: Participants completed an in-home questionnaire on socio-demographic status and medical history, and a comprehensive clinical eye examination, using the same protocol implemented in the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Fundus photographs from 7 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy fields were graded in a masked manner using a modified Airlie House grading system to assess presence and severity of DR. Logistic regression analyses based on a conceptual model of DR risk identified factors associated with prevalent DR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with DR and vision-threatening DR (VTDR). RESULTS: In total, 238 participants were diagnosed with any DR; 27 of these were classified as having VTDR. Both, any DR and VTDR showed statistically significant positive associations with T2DM duration (OR5-9 years = 1.24, OR10-14 years = 2.07, OR15+years = 3.99), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (OR6.5-6.9% = 1.33, OR7-7.9% = 1.86, OR8%+ = 3.22), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (ORper 10mmHg+ = 1.19), and insulin treatment (ORinsulin+ = 2.44). For VTDR, we also found novel associations with antihypertensive drugs (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.61) and statins (OR: 4.96; 95% CI: 1.60-16.41). Chinese Americans and Latinos had a nearly identical DR probability based on HbA1c and SBP. However, Latinos had a higher DR probability at every year of duration of T2DM (≥ 5 years). CONCLUSIONS: While we observed an overall lower DR prevalence in Chinese Americans than in Latinos (35.8% of individuals with TD2M in Chinese Americans versus 42.0% in Latinos), our data indicate that the impact of increasing HbA1c and SBP on DR probability is incrementally the same in both populations. However, increasing T2DM duration is associated with higher DR probability in Latinos than Chinese Americans, even after controlling for other known predictors. Novel factors associated with VTDR include antihypertensive drugs and statins. However, to determine if these drugs impact VTDR susceptibility, we need longitudinal data and more cases.

The African American Eye Disease Study: Design and Methods.

PURPOSE: To describe the study design, operational and recruitment strategies, procedures, and baseline characteristics of the African American Eye Disease Study (AFEDS), a population-based assement of the prevalence of visual impairment, ocular disease, visual function, and health-related quality of life in African Americans. METHODS: This population-based, cross-sectional study included over 6000 African Americans 40 years and older residing in and around Inglewood, California. A detailed interview and eye examination was performed on each eligible participant. The interview included an assessment of demographic, behavioral, and ocular risk factors and health-related and vision-related quality of life. The eye examination included measurements of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, visual fields; fundus and optic disc photography; a detailed anterior and posterior segment examination; and measurements of blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, and blood glucose levels. RESULTS: The AFEDS cohort includes more than 6000 participants that have completed a home questionnaire and a comprehensive eye examination. The majority of participants were female (63%), the average (± standard deviation) overall age was 60.9 (±11.3). Participants are mostly working (40%) or retired (41%), non-smoking (57%), partial drinking (54%), and with at least some college education (38%). A trust-development recruitment strategy was refined in order to overcome challenges in study participation. CONCLUSION: The AFEDS is the largest epidemiologic eye study among African Americans to date. The AFEDS cohort will provide information about the prevalence and risk factors of ocular disease in the largest ophthalmologic study population of African Americans in the United States.

Variation in Intraocular Pressure and the Risk of Developing Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) variation are independently associated with the risk of developing open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: A population-based, longitudinal study. METHODS: A total of 3666 Latinos free of OAG at the baseline of the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study were followed up 4 years later. Maximum IOP, standard deviation (SD) of IOP, range of IOP, and mean IOP were derived from 6 readings obtained at the 2 visits. OAG diagnosis at each visit was based on the consensus of experts who had access to all clinical examination data from that visit. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Maximum, SD, and range of IOP were all associated with risk of developing OAG, and SD and range of IOP remained significantly associated even after adjustment for mean IOP. Maximum IOP provided the best fit to the data and other IOP measures were not associated with OAG risk in the model that had included maximum IOP. The effect of IOP variation varied by the level of IOP. Among participants with higher IOPs (≥15 mm Hg), only higher levels of maximum IOP were associated with a higher OAG risk (P < .05), while SD and range of IOP were not associated with OAG risk. Among participants with lower IOPs (<15 mm Hg), higher levels of maximum, SD, and range of IOP were all associated with a higher risk of developing OAG (P < .05). Mean IOP was associated with OAG risk only in participants with higher IOPs and not in those with lower IOPs. Results were similar when participants were stratified as <18 and ≥18 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: IOP variation was an independent risk factor for OAG. Maximum IOP was the most consistent IOP measure for predicting OAG risk across the entire spectrum of IOPs, possibly by capturing the effect of IOP variation among persons with relative lower IOPs as well as mean IOP effects in those with higher IOPs.

Factors Associated with Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Chinese American Adults: The Chinese American Eye Study (CHES).

OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and multiple factors comprising a conceptual model of AMD risk in a population of Chinese Americans, and to draw comparisons with a similar risk assessment of a Latino population. DESIGN: A cross-sectional population-based study. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 4582 Chinese Americans aged ≥50 residing in Monterey Park, California. METHODS: Participants completed a comprehensive eye examination, including stereoscopic fundus photography and ocular biometric measurements. Fundus images were graded using a modified version of the Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Odds ratios for factors significantly modifying the risk of AMD and its related retinal lesions. RESULTS: Of the eligible participants, 4172 (72%) had fundus photographs gradable for AMD. Early AMD was present in 375 eyes (4.6%), and late AMD was present in 17 (0.2%). Shorter axial length, male sex, older age, and family history of AMD were identified as independent risk factors for prevalent AMD and its characteristic retinal lesions using a conceptual model of potential AMD risk factors. Of 4 AMD risk factors identified for Latinos, 3 (older age, male sex, shorter axial length) overlapped with those identified for Chinese Americans, with an association similar in magnitude and direction. Lower levels of education were a risk factor specific to Latinos. Based on a multivariable logistic regression model, the predicted probability of early AMD was 31% lower among Chinese Americans relative to Latinos (95% confidence interval [CI], 17%-43%). Chinese Americans also had statistically significantly lower odds of any AMD and 2 types of early retinal lesions symptomatic of AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with prevalent AMD are similar for Chinese Americans and Latinos. Chinese Americans who were older, were male, had a family history of AMD, and had a shorter axial length were at an increased risk for AMD compared with those without these risk factors. We observed a significantly lower predicted prevalence of AMD among Chinese Americans compared with Latinos, even after controlling for all relevant covariates, suggesting that additional genetic or lifestyle differences may play an important role in determining AMD risk.

Correlation between Intraocular Pressure and Angle Configuration Measured by OCT: The Chinese American Eye Study.

PURPOSE: To characterize the relationship between angle configuration measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects aged 50 years or older were identified from the Chinese American Eye Study (CHES), a population-based epidemiological study in Los Angeles, CA. METHODS: Each subject underwent a complete ocular exam including Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and AS-OCT imaging. Four AS-OCT images were analyzed per eye and parameters describing angle configuration were measured, including angle opening distance (AOD), angle recess area (ARA), trabecular iris space area (TISA), trabecular iris angle (TIA), and scleral spur angle (SSA). The relationship between AS-OCT measurements and IOP was assessed using locally-weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) regression and change-point analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between AS-OCT measurements and IOP. RESULTS: 702 eyes (382 closed angle and 320 open angle) from 555 subjects were analyzed. Mean IOP for angle closure eyes was 16.3 ± 3.9 mmHg and open angle eyes was 15.3 ± 2.7 mmHg. Mean IOP increased as AS-OCT measurements decreased for all parameters except TIA750. Once measurement values dropped below parameter-specific threshold values, AS-OCT measurements and IOP were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) for AOD500 (r = -0.416), AOD750 (r = -0.213), ARA500 (r = -0.669), ARA750 (r = -0.680), TISA500 (r = -0.655), TISA750 (r = -0.641), SSA500 (r = -0.538), and SSA750 (r = -0.208). There was no correlation between AS-OCT measurements and IOP in open angle eyes (p > 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: There is an anatomic threshold for angle configuration below which IOP is strongly related to the degree of angle closure. This finding suggests reconsideration of current definitions of angle closure and may be relevant for developing new OCT-based methods to identify patients at higher risk for elevated IOP and glaucoma.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Myopic Degeneration in an Adult Chinese American Population: The Chinese American Eye Study.

PURPOSE: To characterize and provide population-based prevalence estimates of myopic degeneration (MD) among Chinese Americans, the fastest-growing minority population in the United States in the last decade. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 1523 Chinese-American adults with myopia, aged 50 years and older, residing in the city of Monterey Park, California, underwent an interview and comprehensive eye examination, including subjective and objective refraction and stereoscopic fundus photography. For each participant, the eye with the worse myopic refractive error was included in this analysis. MD was assessed in a masked manner by an expert grader. RESULTS: The prevalence of any MD was 44.9% among myopic subjects, based on the presence of any degenerative lesion secondary to myopia. The prevalence was 32.2% when MD was defined by a modified version of the Meta-Analysis for Pathologic Myopia. The prevalence of specific lesions included tessellation (31.7%), tilted disc (28.1%), peripapillary atrophy (7.0%), staphyloma (5.7%), diffuse atrophy (6.4%), lacquer cracks (2.6%), intrachoroidal cavitation (2.2%), patchy atrophy (0.9%), and end-stage MD (0.2%). The prevalence of MD was higher among older myopic subjects and among participants with more severe myopia and longer axial length (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the first population-based estimates of MD in Chinese Americans and indicate that a high proportion of Chinese Americans might be at risk for MD and associated visual complications. Prevalence of MD in this cohort of Chinese Americans was higher than that observed in other East Asian populations and in people of other ethnicities.

Ocular Determinants of Refractive Error and Its Age- and Sex-Related Variations in the Chinese American Eye Study.

Importance: Uncorrected refractive error (RE) is a leading cause of visual impairment, and variations in ocular anatomy determine RE. The unique ocular determinants of RE in Chinese American individuals have not been studied previously. Objective: To report ocular determinants of RE in a Chinese American population 50 years and older in Monterey Park, California. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Chinese American Eye Study, a population-based, cross-sectional study, was conducted from February 1, 2010, through October 31, 2013, in Monterey Park, with this particular data analysis performed from January 1 through December 31, 2016. This study included data from 4582 participants who underwent an eye examination to obtain axial length (AL), central corneal thickness, vitreous chamber depth (VCD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal power (CP), noncycloplegic subjective refraction, and lens nuclear opalescence (NOP) grading. Data from the right phakic eye of each participant were used. Multiple regression models (standardized regression coefficients [SRCs] and semipartial correlation coefficients squared [SPCCs2]) identified key determinants of RE. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ocular determinants of RE. Results: Among the 4071 participants eligible for analysis (1496 men [36.7%] and 2575 women [63.3%]; mean [SD] age, 60.5 [8.1] years), mean (SD) RE was -0.52 (2.95) diopters (D), with no sex-related difference. A hyperopic shift occurred in women from -0.62 (2.95) D at 50 to 59 years to 0.60 (1.62) D at 80 years or older and in men from -0.69 (3.00) D at 50 to 59 years to 0.40 (2.29) D at 80 years or older (P < .001 for both). Compared with men, women had shorter AL (mean [SD], 23.62 [1.34] vs 24.14 [1.27] mm; P = .006), shorter ACD (mean [SD], 3.33 [0.34] vs 3.44 [0.34] mm; P < .001), and steeper CP (mean [SD], 43.50 [1.52] vs 42.88 [1.45] D; P = .02), after adjusting for age and height. No sex differences were found in VCD, LT, and NOP after height adjustment. Compared with younger individuals, older individuals had shallower ACD, thicker LT, and more NOP compared with younger individuals (P < .001 for both), even after adjustment for height. Axial length was the strongest determinant of RE (SRC = -0.92; SPCC2 = 0.55), followed by CP (SRC = -0.43; SPCC2 = 0.15). When individual components of AL were evaluated, VCD had the greatest contributing effect (SRC = -0.99; SPCC2 = 0.52), followed by CP (SRC = -0.47; SPCC2 = 0.15) and LT (SRC = -0.29; SPCC2 = 0.06). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that Chinese American individuals have longer AL and greater contribution of AL to RE than do Latino and other Chinese populations. Future studies should explore risk factors for increased AL in Chinese Americans and potential interventions that may ultimately prevent myopia-related disease.